EXECUTIVE TALK
Creative economy needs protection
Published on March 3, 2011 The Nation
"Innovation is key to the golden age." This is how the media recently summed up a well-received and thoughtful speech by Bank of Thailand Governor Prasarn Trairatvorakul, in which he urged the country to focus on innovation as a key to future competiveness.
His comments were yet another sign of growing support for invention in Thailand. On a national level, we are being encouraged to take part in a creative economy. We are being told that this will help Thailand to out-innovate and out-create our country's strongest competitors.
The government is also backing up this effort to build a creative economy with financial support. Deputy Commerce Minister Alongkorn Ponlaboot recently announced a Bt7-billion investment in building Thailand's creative economy this year.
For aspiring entrepreneurs, the creative economy is much more than a political platform. It is - as one software innovator described it - a big step in the right direction that needs to be followed up by enforcement of intellectual-property rights created by the campaign.
"Encouraging the country to innovate is so important," says Thai Software Enterprises' managing director Somporn Maneeratanakul. "But protecting these innovations is equally important. Without good protection for intellectual property, what incentive is there to innovate? Can a creative economy excel without strong protection for the owners of innovations? In my experience, the answer is no."
Consider Somporn's situation. In 1997, he took a financial risk and invested in the copyrights to locally made software. He hired a team of programmers and researchers, established a sales team and began the process of building his business. Yet, 14 years later, Somporn still faces a software-piracy rate of 75 per cent of his product offering.
"With lower levels of software piracy," he says "we would have the resources to create and innovate at much higher levels. We would create more jobs, more wealth, more new ideas. But as it stands, we spend a lot of time and energy protecting our intellectual property."
This is not to take anything away from the strategy behind the government's creative-economy plan. It is, in principal, a sound initiative and our government leaders should be applauded for their focus on innovation and invention.
But for movements such as this to truly take root and develop into viable, wealth-producing, job-creating industries, Thailand must better focus on protecting the intellectual capital created by motivated entrepreneurs.
Given all that Thailand's innovators and creators sacrifice, the least we can do is to protect their innovations and respect their intellectual-property rights.
I fully agree that innovation is the key to the golden age. And I am optimistic about the potential for a creative economy. Thailand clearly has huge potential as a place to be creative. But let's also remember that protection of intellectual-property rights is a critical part of the equation. Without good protection for intellectual property, the golden age will remain something we can only hope to achieve.
Varunee Ratchatapattanakul is a consultant with the Business Software Alliance. She is an attorney specialising in intellectual-property rights.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
This is castrated writing. I am a proactive eunuch, I castrate myself even before the surgeon raises his scalpel.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/24/opinion/24iht-edmurong24.html?_r=3&ref=china
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Buying Grades, Selling Souls
Bought grades, sold souls an all-access pass through the halls of higher learning
Published: 2/01/2011 at 12:00 AM Bangkok Post
Voranai Vanijaka
Want a bachelor's degree? One can be had for between 37,000 to 90,000 baht, depending on the institution. There's a service that will hack into a university's computer, insert your name on a degree and voila, you can even join the graduation ceremony.
Want a 3.5 GPA? No problem. A hacker can arrange it. Want to be on the honour roll? Just pay a little more.
In fact, your kids can even obtain a primary school certificate; that's only 5,000 to 8,000 baht.
Too dumb to do an MBA thesis? No problem. For anywhere between 120,000 and 280,000 baht, someone will write one for you.
A friend of mine owns a learning institute (one of the many in the country) that caters specifically to rich little boys and girls who are too stupid to write their own theses, but whose parents nevertheless love them very much. Business is always brisk. Want to have the title ''Dr'' precede your name? A doctoral thesis will cost you just a bit more.
Don't want to cheat too blatantly? Want to at least make the effort of pretending to go to school? No problem, a few Thai institutes of higher learning offer ''pay and pass'' programmes. As long as you pay your tuition, you will graduate.
Unofficial, but highly popular, eight- year programmes are also available so that they can milk as much money from parents as possible.
A colleague of mine, who I refer to as ''the walking encyclopaedia'', is currently writing doctoral theses for a few of the 111 banned politicians. They plan to make their return to politics with a PhD because it will look good to the voters. Business is brisk.
Pay to pass is old news. Hiring a ghost writer to complete a thesis is common, so is the straight-up purchase of a a degree. It's the same old story. The emergence of computer hackers who can give you a degree and put you on the honour roll is just a new twist.
In all of these cases, it is not the sons and daughters who are paying for the grades and degrees. It's the parents. It's not the students who sell the grades and degrees, it's the adults. And oftentimes, it's the teachers, the administrators and the institutions themselves making the profits.
Put all that together with the news in recent months that teachers are failing exams in basic subjects like maths and science, and that they are coming up with substandard questions for the O-Net exam, and what do we get?
Cheating and corruption is the norm at all levels of society, and incompetency is the sum of our failings.
Consequently, both the government and private sectors are replete with executives and ministers, managers and bureaucrats with snazzy overseas degrees on their walls and little of anything in their brains.
It is no wonder then that we are not ready to open our industries to foreign competition. We just don't have the skills or knowledge to compete, even with the fancy degrees. Of course, there are many genuinely brilliant and honest minds in Thailand. But we have to compete as a whole, not by the handful.
I recently finished my first semester of lecturing at a university. There are those students who are brilliant and meticulous. It was a joy to teach them. There are those students who are very creative, but bored to death with education. Give them a project that challenges them and gets their creative juices flowing, and they will dazzle. Give them an assignment or an exam that requires researches and study, and witness an exercise in mediocrity. It is then the job of the educator to find a way to stimulate them.
There are also those students who couldn't care less; those who cheat without batting an eye.
Why?
There's an old but true answer to that question, one that has no boundaries and is not specific to any culture.
From Bangkok to Timbuktu, we know that leaders need to set an example for their followers, that adults must provide an exemplary model that the young can emulate.
Ladies and gentlemen, a typical classroom is simply a mirror-image of the society at large.
Should we be surprised that the young prefer cheating, when the parents are only too eager to help them do so? Should we be shocked that students don't care about education, when teachers aren't qualified to educate?
Constitution Court judges vehemently deny (allegedly) being caught on tape (allegedly) involving them in an (alleged) exam leak scandal, and there's no investigation, no repercussions. Doctors, who have sworn an oath to heal without discrimination, declare that they will refuse to treat patients if a bill that will allow them to be sued for medical malpractice is passed.
Should we be baffled that students display no guilt or remorse when caught cheating?
Cheating politicians are allowed to run in by-elections and return to their posts. Half of the country supports a former prime minister who was found guilty of corruption and who fled the country. The other half supports a prime minister who condones the rampant corruption in his government.
Should we then be perplexed that students believe they could and should get away with cheating?
If, according to an Abac poll, 76.1% of Thais believe that corruption is OK, as long as the country prospers, does that mean adults and parents believe students' cheating is OK, as long as they pass and graduate?
If 16-year-old Orachorn Thephasadin Na Ayudhya (who now claims she is 17) believes that she should get away with hitting a van on the tollway and causing the deaths of nine people, should we only blame the girl and her well-connected family? Or should we recognise the fact that this is how society works _ and that is because we, the Thai people, work it that way?
If we want to solve Thailand's woes, overcome our failings and progress into the brave new world, we need to stop pointing fingers at others and start accepting responsibility for the things we do each and every day of our lives. There can't be a crisis among the younger generation unless the old generation instigates it.
No doubt, there will be those holier-than-thous who will insist, ''Not me! I'm not responsible for any of this! It's all of you! But not me!'' Well, fine.
As for the rest of us, we all have done things we wish we hadn't.
Just last week, I woke up thinking to myself of a deed (or misdeed) that occurred the previous night. I thought, ''Blast it, I hope there wasn't any CCTV around.''
The young will aspire to be whatever the adults show them they could or should be. We adults have set a very poor example.
There will be more mistakes, more failings, but at the end of it all, there are better things that we can do in life.
It's the second decade of the second millennium, and we could and should give the future of the Thai society a second chance by setting a better example for our children, stumbling along the way as we might.
Contact Voranai Vanijaka via email atvoranaiv@bangkokpost.co.th
Published: 2/01/2011 at 12:00 AM Bangkok Post
Voranai Vanijaka
Want a bachelor's degree? One can be had for between 37,000 to 90,000 baht, depending on the institution. There's a service that will hack into a university's computer, insert your name on a degree and voila, you can even join the graduation ceremony.
Want a 3.5 GPA? No problem. A hacker can arrange it. Want to be on the honour roll? Just pay a little more.
In fact, your kids can even obtain a primary school certificate; that's only 5,000 to 8,000 baht.
Too dumb to do an MBA thesis? No problem. For anywhere between 120,000 and 280,000 baht, someone will write one for you.
A friend of mine owns a learning institute (one of the many in the country) that caters specifically to rich little boys and girls who are too stupid to write their own theses, but whose parents nevertheless love them very much. Business is always brisk. Want to have the title ''Dr'' precede your name? A doctoral thesis will cost you just a bit more.
Don't want to cheat too blatantly? Want to at least make the effort of pretending to go to school? No problem, a few Thai institutes of higher learning offer ''pay and pass'' programmes. As long as you pay your tuition, you will graduate.
Unofficial, but highly popular, eight- year programmes are also available so that they can milk as much money from parents as possible.
A colleague of mine, who I refer to as ''the walking encyclopaedia'', is currently writing doctoral theses for a few of the 111 banned politicians. They plan to make their return to politics with a PhD because it will look good to the voters. Business is brisk.
Pay to pass is old news. Hiring a ghost writer to complete a thesis is common, so is the straight-up purchase of a a degree. It's the same old story. The emergence of computer hackers who can give you a degree and put you on the honour roll is just a new twist.
In all of these cases, it is not the sons and daughters who are paying for the grades and degrees. It's the parents. It's not the students who sell the grades and degrees, it's the adults. And oftentimes, it's the teachers, the administrators and the institutions themselves making the profits.
Put all that together with the news in recent months that teachers are failing exams in basic subjects like maths and science, and that they are coming up with substandard questions for the O-Net exam, and what do we get?
Cheating and corruption is the norm at all levels of society, and incompetency is the sum of our failings.
Consequently, both the government and private sectors are replete with executives and ministers, managers and bureaucrats with snazzy overseas degrees on their walls and little of anything in their brains.
It is no wonder then that we are not ready to open our industries to foreign competition. We just don't have the skills or knowledge to compete, even with the fancy degrees. Of course, there are many genuinely brilliant and honest minds in Thailand. But we have to compete as a whole, not by the handful.
I recently finished my first semester of lecturing at a university. There are those students who are brilliant and meticulous. It was a joy to teach them. There are those students who are very creative, but bored to death with education. Give them a project that challenges them and gets their creative juices flowing, and they will dazzle. Give them an assignment or an exam that requires researches and study, and witness an exercise in mediocrity. It is then the job of the educator to find a way to stimulate them.
There are also those students who couldn't care less; those who cheat without batting an eye.
Why?
There's an old but true answer to that question, one that has no boundaries and is not specific to any culture.
From Bangkok to Timbuktu, we know that leaders need to set an example for their followers, that adults must provide an exemplary model that the young can emulate.
Ladies and gentlemen, a typical classroom is simply a mirror-image of the society at large.
Should we be surprised that the young prefer cheating, when the parents are only too eager to help them do so? Should we be shocked that students don't care about education, when teachers aren't qualified to educate?
Constitution Court judges vehemently deny (allegedly) being caught on tape (allegedly) involving them in an (alleged) exam leak scandal, and there's no investigation, no repercussions. Doctors, who have sworn an oath to heal without discrimination, declare that they will refuse to treat patients if a bill that will allow them to be sued for medical malpractice is passed.
Should we be baffled that students display no guilt or remorse when caught cheating?
Cheating politicians are allowed to run in by-elections and return to their posts. Half of the country supports a former prime minister who was found guilty of corruption and who fled the country. The other half supports a prime minister who condones the rampant corruption in his government.
Should we then be perplexed that students believe they could and should get away with cheating?
If, according to an Abac poll, 76.1% of Thais believe that corruption is OK, as long as the country prospers, does that mean adults and parents believe students' cheating is OK, as long as they pass and graduate?
If 16-year-old Orachorn Thephasadin Na Ayudhya (who now claims she is 17) believes that she should get away with hitting a van on the tollway and causing the deaths of nine people, should we only blame the girl and her well-connected family? Or should we recognise the fact that this is how society works _ and that is because we, the Thai people, work it that way?
If we want to solve Thailand's woes, overcome our failings and progress into the brave new world, we need to stop pointing fingers at others and start accepting responsibility for the things we do each and every day of our lives. There can't be a crisis among the younger generation unless the old generation instigates it.
No doubt, there will be those holier-than-thous who will insist, ''Not me! I'm not responsible for any of this! It's all of you! But not me!'' Well, fine.
As for the rest of us, we all have done things we wish we hadn't.
Just last week, I woke up thinking to myself of a deed (or misdeed) that occurred the previous night. I thought, ''Blast it, I hope there wasn't any CCTV around.''
The young will aspire to be whatever the adults show them they could or should be. We adults have set a very poor example.
There will be more mistakes, more failings, but at the end of it all, there are better things that we can do in life.
It's the second decade of the second millennium, and we could and should give the future of the Thai society a second chance by setting a better example for our children, stumbling along the way as we might.
Contact Voranai Vanijaka via email atvoranaiv@bangkokpost.co.th
Thursday, December 16, 2010
Opinion > Opinion
POST BAG
Thai women work better than Thai men
Published: 16/12/2010 at 12:00 AM
Bangkok Post
In answer to Sethaput Suthiwart-Narueput's question, ''Where have all the men gone...?'' (Bangkok Post, Dec 14) may I humbly suggest that, in order to find answers to this question, he simply visit any school in the kingdom.
Amongst others, I teach two Mathayom 2 classes. One class, predominantly boys, the other, predominantly girls. Both classes suffer from the usual Thai student diseases _ OBD (Obsessive Blackberry Disorder), narcolepsy, chronic copying, creativity deficiency syndrome, and aural disagreement with oral overload _ but, despite these generic (genetic?) afflictions, the girls still manage to find a way to do their classwork, do their homework, ask intelligent questions, keep their books and the classroom clean, and generally be interesting, respectful and, most importantly, responsible human beings.
The boys, well, not so much. They like pretending to be kung-fu masters, spinning their pens, making ''miaow'' noises, jabbing sharpened straws up each other's derriers, and generally doing all the things that your average Western kindergartener is already starting to think a little juvenile.
I have a friend who runs a factory in Thailand. In their first year, they had so many problems that they nearly went under. The staff were constantly absent, constantly hung over (or drunk), constantly sneaking off for naps, constantly delivering the kind of shoddy work that you see everywhere, and constantly demanding more money be cause, as they put it, ''I want it!'' He then discovered a pattern. The problem staff were all Thai men. In fact, it was fair to say that the Thai men were all problem staff.
The factory now has a policy. For any job where it is even remotely possible to employ a woman, even if that woman is initially less qualified than the male applicants, they will employ her. The factory is now doing very nicely, thank you (and the place smells much nicer, too).
Now, I could tell you what the root cause of this is, what the root cause of pretty much all of Thailand's woes is, but the only people who would agree are those Westerners who don't have ''some lovely Thai people at work who sort all that stuff out for me'' and the odd Thai who doesn't adhere to the Kasit Piromya school of how to deal with constructive criticism, i.e. ''No... you are!''
So, what can be done about this? Well, I would say, please don't do anything about this. Let the trend continue. Actively encourage it! The sooner Thailand is run by responsible, intelligent, diligent, mature and reasonable Thai women, the better for Thailand.
Thai men are welcome to rebut, though I imagine most of them will be either too lazy to do so, too busy jabbing sharpened things where sharpened things have no business being, or too incapable of even reading this in the first place.
Let me stress that I am not a feminist. I like my girlfriend to wear her hair long and her skirts short. She does the ironing, cooking and cleaning way better than I ever would see the need to. And I expect her to give up work and take care of any sprogs we might fashion in the future.
But then I don't have to give her all my wages every month because I can't be trusted to not spend it all the first week on Regency with my buddies at the marble checkers table outside the local shop; I don't think it's okay to have women on the side; I don't exist in a perpetual state of grumpiness and aloof disinterest with her; and I would employ her before I would employ myself any day of the week. I am, after all, a man as well.
MICHAEL PHILLIPS
POST BAG
Thai women work better than Thai men
Published: 16/12/2010 at 12:00 AM
Bangkok Post
In answer to Sethaput Suthiwart-Narueput's question, ''Where have all the men gone...?'' (Bangkok Post, Dec 14) may I humbly suggest that, in order to find answers to this question, he simply visit any school in the kingdom.
Amongst others, I teach two Mathayom 2 classes. One class, predominantly boys, the other, predominantly girls. Both classes suffer from the usual Thai student diseases _ OBD (Obsessive Blackberry Disorder), narcolepsy, chronic copying, creativity deficiency syndrome, and aural disagreement with oral overload _ but, despite these generic (genetic?) afflictions, the girls still manage to find a way to do their classwork, do their homework, ask intelligent questions, keep their books and the classroom clean, and generally be interesting, respectful and, most importantly, responsible human beings.
The boys, well, not so much. They like pretending to be kung-fu masters, spinning their pens, making ''miaow'' noises, jabbing sharpened straws up each other's derriers, and generally doing all the things that your average Western kindergartener is already starting to think a little juvenile.
I have a friend who runs a factory in Thailand. In their first year, they had so many problems that they nearly went under. The staff were constantly absent, constantly hung over (or drunk), constantly sneaking off for naps, constantly delivering the kind of shoddy work that you see everywhere, and constantly demanding more money be cause, as they put it, ''I want it!'' He then discovered a pattern. The problem staff were all Thai men. In fact, it was fair to say that the Thai men were all problem staff.
The factory now has a policy. For any job where it is even remotely possible to employ a woman, even if that woman is initially less qualified than the male applicants, they will employ her. The factory is now doing very nicely, thank you (and the place smells much nicer, too).
Now, I could tell you what the root cause of this is, what the root cause of pretty much all of Thailand's woes is, but the only people who would agree are those Westerners who don't have ''some lovely Thai people at work who sort all that stuff out for me'' and the odd Thai who doesn't adhere to the Kasit Piromya school of how to deal with constructive criticism, i.e. ''No... you are!''
So, what can be done about this? Well, I would say, please don't do anything about this. Let the trend continue. Actively encourage it! The sooner Thailand is run by responsible, intelligent, diligent, mature and reasonable Thai women, the better for Thailand.
Thai men are welcome to rebut, though I imagine most of them will be either too lazy to do so, too busy jabbing sharpened things where sharpened things have no business being, or too incapable of even reading this in the first place.
Let me stress that I am not a feminist. I like my girlfriend to wear her hair long and her skirts short. She does the ironing, cooking and cleaning way better than I ever would see the need to. And I expect her to give up work and take care of any sprogs we might fashion in the future.
But then I don't have to give her all my wages every month because I can't be trusted to not spend it all the first week on Regency with my buddies at the marble checkers table outside the local shop; I don't think it's okay to have women on the side; I don't exist in a perpetual state of grumpiness and aloof disinterest with her; and I would employ her before I would employ myself any day of the week. I am, after all, a man as well.
MICHAEL PHILLIPS
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Making Thailand a medical hub is "evil" and "crazy" policy
I'm glad someone of a high stature in Thai academic circles, like Dr. Ammar Siamwalla, has finally had the guts to speak up on this issue. But why has he waited so long? Was he intimidated during the time of Mr. Taksin? I for one who have to rely on "prakan sangkom" (social insurance) knows first hand the great difference in service in ordinary hospitals and hospitals catering for foreigners. I get the cheapest medicine and the doctors I see are overwhelmed by exceedingly long queues that they don't even have time to establish eye contact. How much more for poor people who have to rely on the "30 baht scheme" or whatever its new reincarnation in the Abhisit government? Never mind (mai pen rai). Thais have a high regard for doctors.
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/10/30/national/Economist-calls-plan-to-attract-foreign-patients-&-30141164.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economist calls plan to attract foreign patients 'evil' and 'crazy'
Published on October 30, 2010
Prominent economist Ammar Siamwala yesterday called for the government to stop its plan to become a medical hub. He said the policy had already adversely affected the public health system by diverting resources, including physicians, from public hospitals to treat foreign patients instead of the poor in rural areas.
Being a medical hub "is the worst policy that the government could ever think up", he said.
Ammar was speaking at the 2010 Thailand Pharmaceutical Summit organised by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PReMA).
The medicalhub project, initiated in 2003 by the Thaksin Shinawatra government, included three facets: sickness prevention, spa services and Thai massage. It also promoted Thai herbalmedicine products.
Ammar said the policy had induced a lot of medical workers and physicians to quit public hospitals for private ones, where they can get higher salaries and benefits, causing a shortage of doctors and staff at rural hospitals.
He said the Public Health Ministry, which oversees public hospitals, could not compete with private hospitals.
"The ministry has already increased monthly salaries for medical workers and doctors at state hospitals but they still ask it to increase their salaries again and again. Never enough," he said. "How could the ministry compete with the private sector to attract medical workers?"
If the ministry decided to increase salaries enough to satisfy the medical workers, it would affect the National Health Security Fund and the Social Security Fund, as these two funds have to seek financial resources to support the salaries and allowances for medical workers.
"I would not suggest to the government the best way to go ahead with the plan. Instead I want the government to change its mind and stop this evil plan," he said.
He said some medical schools, such as the one at Siriraj Hospital, were seeking ways to increase the monthly salary for doctors to keep them in the publichealth system but also training them to provide premium medical services to foreign patients.
"Why should we welcome ill, rich foreign patients? This is so crazy," he said.
However, if the government is so stubborn as to go ahead with its medicalhub plan, he said it should collect fees from foreign patients to support the special fund for more medical workers and doctors at rural hospitals, which face a shortage of practitioners.
The Health Support Services Department, which oversees the government's medicalhub policy, is to conduct a public hearing on the idea. Ammar suggested that the department invite a patient network to participate in the public hearing.
Ammar also expressed concern over the high cost of treatment, especially among elderly people who suffer from chronic diseases such as diabetes.
He said most pharmaceutical companies were focusing on creating new technology and medicines to treat elderly patients who suffer from chronic diseases and selling these at high prices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacy Policy © 2009 Nation Multimedia Group
November 7, 2010 09:38 am (Thai local time)
www.nationmultimedia.com
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/10/30/national/Economist-calls-plan-to-attract-foreign-patients-&-30141164.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economist calls plan to attract foreign patients 'evil' and 'crazy'
Published on October 30, 2010
Prominent economist Ammar Siamwala yesterday called for the government to stop its plan to become a medical hub. He said the policy had already adversely affected the public health system by diverting resources, including physicians, from public hospitals to treat foreign patients instead of the poor in rural areas.
Being a medical hub "is the worst policy that the government could ever think up", he said.
Ammar was speaking at the 2010 Thailand Pharmaceutical Summit organised by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PReMA).
The medicalhub project, initiated in 2003 by the Thaksin Shinawatra government, included three facets: sickness prevention, spa services and Thai massage. It also promoted Thai herbalmedicine products.
Ammar said the policy had induced a lot of medical workers and physicians to quit public hospitals for private ones, where they can get higher salaries and benefits, causing a shortage of doctors and staff at rural hospitals.
He said the Public Health Ministry, which oversees public hospitals, could not compete with private hospitals.
"The ministry has already increased monthly salaries for medical workers and doctors at state hospitals but they still ask it to increase their salaries again and again. Never enough," he said. "How could the ministry compete with the private sector to attract medical workers?"
If the ministry decided to increase salaries enough to satisfy the medical workers, it would affect the National Health Security Fund and the Social Security Fund, as these two funds have to seek financial resources to support the salaries and allowances for medical workers.
"I would not suggest to the government the best way to go ahead with the plan. Instead I want the government to change its mind and stop this evil plan," he said.
He said some medical schools, such as the one at Siriraj Hospital, were seeking ways to increase the monthly salary for doctors to keep them in the publichealth system but also training them to provide premium medical services to foreign patients.
"Why should we welcome ill, rich foreign patients? This is so crazy," he said.
However, if the government is so stubborn as to go ahead with its medicalhub plan, he said it should collect fees from foreign patients to support the special fund for more medical workers and doctors at rural hospitals, which face a shortage of practitioners.
The Health Support Services Department, which oversees the government's medicalhub policy, is to conduct a public hearing on the idea. Ammar suggested that the department invite a patient network to participate in the public hearing.
Ammar also expressed concern over the high cost of treatment, especially among elderly people who suffer from chronic diseases such as diabetes.
He said most pharmaceutical companies were focusing on creating new technology and medicines to treat elderly patients who suffer from chronic diseases and selling these at high prices.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacy Policy © 2009 Nation Multimedia Group
November 7, 2010 09:38 am (Thai local time)
www.nationmultimedia.com
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Development without Modernization
If I seem to have lost interest in my blog, it isn't so. It's just that as a foreigner, discretion is the better part of valor after witnessing how the Thai government ordered the "blunt hammer" of the Thai Army to shoot demonstrators. The subsequent handling of the government as shown by their ridiculous attempts at "reconciliation" has only ended in what may have been subconciously the Abhisit's government intention in the first place - to forget and deny. The Reds are a non-entity. The Reds are terrorists.
I am more and more convinced that in any society, the kind of education (indoctrination) will be an important indicator of its degree of democratization and determine the length of time it will take for the country to narrow that gap between the first and last scenario asserted by Abraham Lincoln: "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
By 2050, 40 years from now, when it is predicted that parts of Bangkok will suffer from innundation from the combination of a 100 year cycle rainfall, and high tides, I am convinced that Thai education system will advance very little. I hope to be proven wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/10/21/opinion/This-quick-fix-for-schools-is-failing-our-children-30140544.html
This quick fix for schools is failing our children
By The Nation, Published on October 21, 2010
Plan to declare English as second language in classroom ignores real problem: huge class sizes and outdated teaching methods
The debate on whether the Education Ministry should declare English as the second language in schools does not address the root cause of the problems in Thai schools. The real issue is the quality of teaching, not just of English but of all the subjects that students need to learn to be equipped for the future. Thai students already spend several hours on each subject per week in the classroom. What remains highly debatable, however, is whether schools give their students the quality time essential to learning.
The attempt to declare English as the second language in the classroom is an admirable thing and shows we are concerned over the low quality of learning. Knowledge of English undoubtedly broadens students' opportunities for learning. But it does not take a grand ambition to place English as the second language to solve the problem. Educators can tackle the issue effectively if they themselves are willing to learn and remain open-minded.
Every Thai student already studies English, but the average level of proficiency is highly questionable. Many teachers have not received training to improve their skills, or access to new knowledge. Some simply don't have the language skills to teach English. This means that many of our students are stuck with unqualified teachers day in, day out.
Although educators often claim they want to prepare students for the fast-changing world, most Thai schools still operate in the same way as their predecessors half a century ago. Typically, up to 50 students are crammed into one classroom and subjected to robotic learning by rote. Teaching methods have barely changed over the years. One change we can expect to see, though, is a drop in the quality of teachers, as their low pay means that teaching is no longer a coveted profession.
The authorities are scrambling for a quick fix. Instead of getting to the root of the problem, they prefer to announce a big-budget programme under a "sexy" title. But spending money alone will not guarantee satisfactory results. It is a shame that money is being lavished on education but producing nothing for our kids.
Rather than debating the terms of our English teaching, educators should take a direct route to improving learning by, first, focusing on limiting the class size for each subject. This puts the priority on ensuring every student receives sufficient attention from teachers. The method of learning by rote does not inspire students to excel at subjects for which they show aptitude. The current classroom environment fails when it comes to promoting either multidimensional learning or students' self-esteem. Students are often judged simply on their ability to memorise lessons, meaning that those with other talents can feel discouraged and left out.
Teachers should also receive constant training, because we owe it to our students to provide them with the best possible schooling. Improvements could also be made if public schools drew more on the resources of progressive or international schools, which are more up to date with techniques.
Meanwhile, an open-minded attitude is essential among teachers and school principals; learning is a never-ending process. Efforts to get retiree native English-speakers to assist in Thai schools have been unsuccessful largely because of the cold reception from teachers who are more concerned about their turf and ego than their students. These teachers should be sacked.
Teaching our children to become good "global citizens" should also be on the agenda. For instance, they should be taught about conserving energy and the impact they can have on the environment. But responsibility and citizenship are not sufficiently addressed. Instead, youngsters only hear adults asking for their rights but refusing to be accountable.
And most importantly, students should be given belief in their capacity and ability. Rather than promoting youngsters' self-actualisation, schools tend to punish students who don't perform well in the robotic model of learning. Meaningful knowledge is sidelined in favour of teaching students to fit into a mould by achieving good grades.
Thai students need to learn more about their geography and history to see how this physical and cultural background has shaped them. This will then enable them to understand themselves better. In contrast, currently they are usually forced merely to memorise information without learning how to think with it.
I am more and more convinced that in any society, the kind of education (indoctrination) will be an important indicator of its degree of democratization and determine the length of time it will take for the country to narrow that gap between the first and last scenario asserted by Abraham Lincoln: "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
By 2050, 40 years from now, when it is predicted that parts of Bangkok will suffer from innundation from the combination of a 100 year cycle rainfall, and high tides, I am convinced that Thai education system will advance very little. I hope to be proven wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/home/2010/10/21/opinion/This-quick-fix-for-schools-is-failing-our-children-30140544.html
This quick fix for schools is failing our children
By The Nation, Published on October 21, 2010
Plan to declare English as second language in classroom ignores real problem: huge class sizes and outdated teaching methods
The debate on whether the Education Ministry should declare English as the second language in schools does not address the root cause of the problems in Thai schools. The real issue is the quality of teaching, not just of English but of all the subjects that students need to learn to be equipped for the future. Thai students already spend several hours on each subject per week in the classroom. What remains highly debatable, however, is whether schools give their students the quality time essential to learning.
The attempt to declare English as the second language in the classroom is an admirable thing and shows we are concerned over the low quality of learning. Knowledge of English undoubtedly broadens students' opportunities for learning. But it does not take a grand ambition to place English as the second language to solve the problem. Educators can tackle the issue effectively if they themselves are willing to learn and remain open-minded.
Every Thai student already studies English, but the average level of proficiency is highly questionable. Many teachers have not received training to improve their skills, or access to new knowledge. Some simply don't have the language skills to teach English. This means that many of our students are stuck with unqualified teachers day in, day out.
Although educators often claim they want to prepare students for the fast-changing world, most Thai schools still operate in the same way as their predecessors half a century ago. Typically, up to 50 students are crammed into one classroom and subjected to robotic learning by rote. Teaching methods have barely changed over the years. One change we can expect to see, though, is a drop in the quality of teachers, as their low pay means that teaching is no longer a coveted profession.
The authorities are scrambling for a quick fix. Instead of getting to the root of the problem, they prefer to announce a big-budget programme under a "sexy" title. But spending money alone will not guarantee satisfactory results. It is a shame that money is being lavished on education but producing nothing for our kids.
Rather than debating the terms of our English teaching, educators should take a direct route to improving learning by, first, focusing on limiting the class size for each subject. This puts the priority on ensuring every student receives sufficient attention from teachers. The method of learning by rote does not inspire students to excel at subjects for which they show aptitude. The current classroom environment fails when it comes to promoting either multidimensional learning or students' self-esteem. Students are often judged simply on their ability to memorise lessons, meaning that those with other talents can feel discouraged and left out.
Teachers should also receive constant training, because we owe it to our students to provide them with the best possible schooling. Improvements could also be made if public schools drew more on the resources of progressive or international schools, which are more up to date with techniques.
Meanwhile, an open-minded attitude is essential among teachers and school principals; learning is a never-ending process. Efforts to get retiree native English-speakers to assist in Thai schools have been unsuccessful largely because of the cold reception from teachers who are more concerned about their turf and ego than their students. These teachers should be sacked.
Teaching our children to become good "global citizens" should also be on the agenda. For instance, they should be taught about conserving energy and the impact they can have on the environment. But responsibility and citizenship are not sufficiently addressed. Instead, youngsters only hear adults asking for their rights but refusing to be accountable.
And most importantly, students should be given belief in their capacity and ability. Rather than promoting youngsters' self-actualisation, schools tend to punish students who don't perform well in the robotic model of learning. Meaningful knowledge is sidelined in favour of teaching students to fit into a mould by achieving good grades.
Thai students need to learn more about their geography and history to see how this physical and cultural background has shaped them. This will then enable them to understand themselves better. In contrast, currently they are usually forced merely to memorise information without learning how to think with it.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
The day I became a Red Shirt
Since I have never attended any public demonstration of either yellow PAD or red shirts throughout the political turmoil that has descended on Bangkok’s political scene starting from the 2006 coup, I decided to witness the passing of the red caravan today, Saturday, March 20th, 2010. My interest was piqued not only by the unpopular status of the red shirts (the underdogs) as portrayed by the Bangkok Press but also that the Governor of Bangkok, M.R. Sukhumbhand Paribatra, in his infinite wisdom (the M.R. does not stand for Mister, but an honorific title that indicates close consanguinity to royal blood lines) had advised city residents to stay at home Saturday as red-shirt demonstrators are to march through the capital (The Nation, March 19, 2010). I’ve asked myself, is the Governor anti-Red or anti-business or both? Imagine voluntarily staying at home on a Saturday?
I started taking pictures at 10:30AM as I arrived at the Phayathai intersection in Petchburi Road. I noticed that no one was allowed to use the overpass (by what looked like Red security personnel) and the Red convoy used both sides of the Petchburi Road intersection. The flow at the intersection was controlled by the time interval of the traffic lights enforced by a few policemen, as a result of which, the heavy volume of the persistent and noisy red convoy caused crossing traffic along Phayathai Road from both Siam Square and Victory Monument to back up. However, the flow of reds was going quite smoothly with all kinds of vehicles from SUVs bearing Bangkok plates, countless motorcycles, assorted pickups, rented taxis, provincial rot tu, to an occasional but out of place tuktuk.
Contrary to nagging feelings that I was putting myself needlessly in danger (as a foreigner) amidst the “mob” of red shirts who recently committed the shocking blood pouring protest in front of the government and PM houses, a sensation made worse by the enervating vapours emanating from the heat island effect of downtown Bangkok – instead, I was swept by the cathartic experience of witnessing the so called carabaos (khwai), unspohisticated and brainless rural people, the poor and neglected people of this country assert their rights to protest, to be different, disagree with the present government legitimacy and insist on its dissolution. As only Thais are capable of, this was not a sullen crowd, rather a crowd patiently demonstrating to Bangkokians that they were here and willing to sacrifice to camp out in the scorching heat of the nation's capital, its seat of power, to make their voices and discontents heard whether city folks like us welcome them or not. But also more importantly, in that unique Thai celebratory way of “sanuk”, not getting too caught up with the seriousness of intentions or implications of their actions. Horns from a variety of vehicles plus plastic horns (reminiscent of birthday parties or new year's celebrations) were blown in a staccato beat to the cadence of “ook pai” - about the only thing I could make out. I pitied those who were riding at the back of open pickups and trucks, directly exposed to the merciless sun of summer. But they didn’t look dejected or discouraged. Some were dancing unself-consciously gay to the music blared by loudspeakers from trucks and pickups, and shaking vigorously the clappers shaped in the form of white and red hearts or feet as if in a puny way, they could imitate the trumpets of Joshua's Israelite army and bring down the walls of Jericho - the government of Abhisit Vejajiva with the resonant maddeningly cricket-like sounds of these innocuous plastic clappers. I noticed a crowd of bystanders cheering them up, responding with the same clappers to signal their support and encouragement, while others waved their welcome or gave the “thumbs up” gesture.
Tears fell involuntarily – perhaps in a mixture of pity, the underdogs fighting the established wealthy elites and powerful in Bangkok, what chance do they have? And perhaps of hope too sent their way in silent testimony, that the injustices that they have laid bare and the demands for social justice claimed and social wrongs redressed from the uneven development produced by the headlong rush of Thailand and its controlling elites to take advantage of globalization. That at long last, in their own small way, the reds are protesting this monster we call “globalization”.
I should make it clear that seeing through this catharsis, the red cause is wrought with a lot of confusion and contradictions. It must clear itself from association with Mr. Taksin, which in this case is only a means to an end, as a galvanizing issue. But beyond that, it is for the reds to correct the political process in this country with its extreme urban bias that lives off the surplus and the sweat equity of the agricultural sector. Although it may appear that this magnificent convoy of red protest is a masterful strategy to counter the anti-red Thai press by showing Bangkokians first hand the depth of the discontent and anger through sheer numbers, had been subsidized by powers that be who want to manipulate it for their own purposes, I doubt if many red shirts have been completely seduced by the same old patronage tactics. Not in the heat of summer, not when there is no chance of winning, when they are not fighting in their own territory but in the dazzling capital where the inhabitants look down on them as less than human. I am sure that many of them see the complex issue of social change as inextricably tied up to the ebbing influence, power and significance of the monarchy in this day and age and the absence of countervailing democratic institutions that will improve their life chances. One of the nagging problems, as the recent Economist article notes (http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15718981) is precisely the absence of discussion that would allay the deep anxieties of a people long brainwashed by the ideology of indigenous power elites bent on its preservation (no matter how anachronistic), that at least could have prepared the people of eventualities by considering the alternatives. I observed only one vehicle that displayed the photo of HM the King on its window. In terms of symbolism, the Thai flag amidst red banners were much more in common, something that I found truly amazing in a country that without a monarchy is still unthinkable to many.
Tired, exhausted and probably carcinogized by the exhaust of a thousand polluting vehicles, now backed up predictably to a standstill as the convoy head winded its way probably to the traffic choked streets of Lardprao road, I took my last photo at 12:26 PM. Looking in the direction of Yommarat intersection, I would have guessed the tail end of the convoy was at least still another fantastic kilometer away.
Godspeed red shirts!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
